On Mar 6, 2013, at 3:13 PM, George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... > I'm sorry, but a lot of organizations' response to IPv6 has been "Ok, > desktops will need an overlay of it for some websites in AP next year, > so we'll do that. And we need an IPv6 front end visibility for our > website. If nothing else, it's worthing giving that last point some priority (i.e. "And we need an IPv6 front end visibility for our website.") While the Internet is greater than the web, the more public facing servers reachable by IPv6, the more functional IPv6 is as an IPv4 substitute for connecting customers to the Internet. /John
