On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> Abstract nonsense.

No, it isn't.

The *actual* end-to-end principle states that whenever possible and whenever it 
makes sense, application-specific functionality ought to be incorporated into 
end-nodes rather than into intermediary systems.  In the case of LISP, it can 
be noted that either a) the end-to-end principle has no relevance, or b) LISP 
is closer to adherence to the end-to-end principle than the current routing 
system.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

          Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.

                       -- John Milton


Reply via email to