On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote: > Abstract nonsense.
No, it isn't. The *actual* end-to-end principle states that whenever possible and whenever it makes sense, application-specific functionality ought to be incorporated into end-nodes rather than into intermediary systems. In the case of LISP, it can be noted that either a) the end-to-end principle has no relevance, or b) LISP is closer to adherence to the end-to-end principle than the current routing system. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton