On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:06 PM, George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is (or was) fairly commonly in use among internal nets which > overflowed RFC 1918 or have to internetwork with other heavy users of > RFC 1918 space. I know of at least two service providers and one cell > network who were using it for that 3 years ago. >
I am pretty sure Class E is completely defunct and not used anywhere since Cisco and Juniper routers do not forward the packets (circa 2008 testing) and no known host accept it as a valid address, AFAIK. CB > Someone leaking internal routes for such? Or attempt to hijack the space? > > Only the Shadow knows... > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No authorized IETF use that I know of. See >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml >> >> Thanks, >> Donald >> ============================= >> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >> 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA >> d3e...@gmail.com >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Buz Dale <buzd...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is anyone else seeing a lot of Class E address space (240.0.0.0/4) at their >>> borders? Has this space been reinstated in some as yet unknown to me RFC? >>> Thanks, >>> Buz >>> >>> -- >>> Buz Dale >>> buzd...@gmail.com >>> GMT -5 >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Buz Dale >>> buzd...@gmail.com >>> GMT -5 >>> -- >> > > > > -- > -george william herbert > george.herb...@gmail.com >
