But of course. :-) Also, just saw this:
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet - ferg On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And do not forget .... > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp38 > > :) > > -as > > > On 3/27/13 2:17 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote: >> Please reference: >> >> http://openresolverproject.org/ >> http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/ >> http://blog.cloudflare.com/deep-inside-a-dns-amplification-ddos-attack >> >> ...and anything else to raise the awareness level. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - ferg (co-perpetrator of BCP38) :-) >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Alain Hebert <aheb...@pubnix.net> wrote: >> >>> bcp38.org coming soon =D >>> >>> ----- >>> Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net >>> PubNIX Inc. >>> 50 boul. St-Charles >>> P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 >>> Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 >>> >>> On 03/27/13 11:20, Jack Bates wrote: >>>> Outside of needing more details and examples, BCP38 could use more >>>> advertising. >>>> >>>> The best option, if they would accept it, is to have all RIRs mention >>>> BCP38 as well as require that mention of BCP38 be included in all IP >>>> justification requests to customers (so that those who receive >>>> netblocks from their ISPs are also aware of it). >>>> >>>> For ARIN, at least, having it mentioned in the attestation process >>>> wouldn't be a bad idea. At least someone of management would be aware >>>> of it. >>>> >>>> The only issue is see concerning the RIRs is that they may object to >>>> it being out of scope to their duties. However, informing people of >>>> something is not requiring implementation of something. On the other >>>> hand, we know that there are a great number of networks that don't >>>> participate with the community at large and may have no idea about >>>> BCP38 and why it is important. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson fergdawgster(at)gmail.com