On 3 Apr 2013, at 23:20, Warren Bailey <wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > Try it with upwards of 900ms of variable latency.
The last crazy result I got was 146mbit/s on a hardwired 100 mbit link and 1-2ms latency to the speedtest.net server I was using at the time (same data centre). Testing this sort of thing with high latency and jitter is understandably hard, but I didn't see a good reason at the time why it should have been so badly out with good underlying network characteristics. Nick > > > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> > Date: 04/03/2013 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test > > > On 3 Apr 2013, at 22:48, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > (If anybody's got evidence of it reporting more than the link is technically > > capable of, feel free to correct me...) > > I've seen speedtest.net give results significantly greater than the physical > bw of the client's network link. > > Nick > > >
