Yes. In the fallout from the Cloudflare attack of last week it was announced that several IXs were going to stop advertising the address space of their peering lan, which properly does not need to be advertised anyway.
Yes, that will cause some minor problems for those who work for and with the companies that peer there, but they are *clients*, and should be able to have other similar arrangements made for them. Cheers, -- jra ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yang Yu" <yang.yu.l...@gmail.com> > To: k...@network-services.uoregon.edu > Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 7:20:44 PM > Subject: Re: route for linx.net in Level3? > I noticed it too this morning from a AS3549 customer. Level 3 LG shows > no route for 195.66.232.0/22 on North American sites. > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:52 PM, John Kemp > <k...@network-services.uoregon.edu> wrote: > > > > Having trouble reaching route-views.linx.routeviews.org from AS3582. > > > > I'm assuming that some folks stopped carrying > > this particular linx.net address prefix > > as of this morning. ?!? > > > > $ whois -h whois.cymru.com " -v 195.66.241.146" > > AS | IP | BGP Prefix | CC | Registry | > > Allocated | AS Name > > 5459 | 195.66.241.146 | 195.66.240.0/22 | GB | ripencc | > > 1997-12-01 | LINX-AS London Internet Exchange Ltd. > > > > $ dig +short 146.241.66.195.peer.asn.cymru.com TXT > > "1299 2914 3257 10310 | 195.66.240.0/22 | GB | ripencc | 1997-12-01" > > > > -- > > John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org) > > RouteViews Engineer > > NOC: n...@routeviews.org > > MAIL: h...@routeviews.org > > WWW: http://www.routeviews.org > > -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
