On 4/29/13 1:03 AM, "Jérôme Nicolle" <jer...@ceriz.fr> wrote:
>Le 24/04/2013 07:46, Tore Anderson a écrit : >> Trying to reclaim and redistribute unused space would be a tremendous >> waste of effort. > >It is necessary to keep an acceptable churn and still allocate small >blocks to newcomers, merely to deploy CGNs. > >Not doing so would end up in courts for entry barrier enforced by a >monopoly (the RIRs). There is a /10 reserved to facilitate IPv6 deployment: https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10 "Reclamation" is facilitated by offering a financial benefit, i.e., selling underused addresses. > >Therefore it is inevitable to reclaim unused address space as long as >there's a demand for IPv4, wich will still be strong as long as major >players refuse to do their jobs. > >Moreover, I think it's necessary for all responsible LIR and RIRs to >take a stand and vote policies to reclaim address space from networks >who are still not deploying IPv6 as those obviously don't want to be a >part of the Internet anymore. I encourage you to propose such a policy: https://www.arin.net/participate/how_to_participate.html Please make sure the proposal includes clear metrics for when to reclaim, so ARIN staff isn't forced to rely on what may be inconsistent judgement calls. Lee