I agree with previous poster, table size progression and corresponding increase in search delay, probably related directly to the monitoring itself, or at least a connection state of some kind.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Jake Khuon <kh...@neebu.net> wrote: > On 31/05/13 17:30, Brett Frankenberger wrote: > > How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like >>> that? >>> I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!). >>> >> > Variation of the buffer filling theory is that there's some > QoS/traffic-shaping going on which is causing your ping packets to get > classed and policed into an ever depleting buffer pool. > > I wonder what would happen to the pattern if you reset the interface. |8^) > > > -- > /*=================[ Jake Khuon <kh...@neebu.net> ]=================+ > | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | -------- | > | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS | > +=============================**==============================**=======*/ > >