On Jun 22, 2013, at 7:19 AM, Brandon Martin <lists.na...@monmotha.net> wrote:
> On 06/22/2013 12:44 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: >>>> The forwarding hardware is generally going to be the limit, and >>>> that's going to be painful enough as we approach a half million >>>> prefixes. >>> >>> True. And that's why we must avoid IPv6. >> >> This is not only wrong, it makes no sense whatsoever. >> > > > So here's a question: has anyone done any musings/reasearch on how big of a > global IPv6 table we could expect given current policies if IPv6 were as > widely deployed and used as IPv4 (or if IPv4 didn't exist)? > -- > Brandon Martin Yes… It will probably settle out somewhere around 100-125K routes. Owen
