On Jun 25, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > this I thought included the capabilities to drag the fiber/line into the hull > for 'work' to be done... I'd note that introducing signal > loss on the longhaul fiber seems 'risky', you'd have to know (and this isn't > hard I bet) the tolerances of the link in question and have a > way to stay inside those tolerances and not introduce new > splice-points/junctions/etc and be careful for the undersea cable > power (electric) requirements as well.
Kind of makes one think about the spate of high-profile submarine cable breaks over the past couple of years in a different light, doesn't it? ;> > and yea, why not just work with the landindstation operators to use the > existing monitoring ports they use? (or get a copy of the monitor ports) Operational security in the original meaning of the term (i.e., what people don't know about, they can't talk to reporters from the Guardian about). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
