Perhaps we should all take a moment and review RFC 5735, 6598, 6890, and 5156 and implement filtering in the appropriate places and help make the Internet a safer place to play. Think of the children!
...heh --chip On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Siegel, David <david.sie...@level3.com> > wrote: > > This should now be fixed. > > > > As a general matter of policy, we do filter out 10/8, but somehow the > filter list for a customer was empty which then defaults to an implicit > accept. We're in the process of improving our config audits to catch this > in the future. > > > > what happens if they register a route object for 10/8? :) > > > Dave > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Larry Sheldon [mailto:larryshel...@cox.net] > > Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:31 PM > > To: nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 > > > > On 7/20/2013 11:26 PM, Yang Yu wrote: > >> It appears AS3549 is announcing 10.0.0.0/8. I noticed it from an > >> AS3549 customer. > > > > I wonder why people don't drop any update that contains stuff like RFC > > 1918 space. > > -- > > Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics > > of System Administrators: > > Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to > > learn from their mistakes. > > (Adapted from Stephen Pinker) > > > > > > -- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....