On 2013-10-09, at 10:10, Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net> wrote: > Once upon a time, Blair Trosper <blair.tros...@gmail.com> said: >> True, but the location information, at least the state, is quasi-helpful. > > That's another good reason to have reverse records for defined router > interfaces. Auto-generated reverse for eveything doesn't give any > useful info though.
If people really want to use generic reverse names and have realised that the v6 address space is much too big for $GENERATE, one approach is to delegate the appropriate zones to a custom nameserver that can auto-generate PTRs on demand. There are scaling problems here, but probably nothing that can't be fixed with high TTLs and multiple nameservers. If I was doing that, my instinct would be to code against Ray Bellis' evldns (see <http://code.google.com/p/evldns/>). Note that I'm not suggesting that auto-generated v6 PTRs (or v4 PTRs) are a good idea. But I'm aware that a lack of reverse DNS on either protocol can make the helpdesk phone ring, so there is certainly a pragmatic argument in favour of it. Joe
