On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Constantine A. Murenin <muren...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Dear NANOG@,
>
...
> From hetzner.de through he.net:
>
>
> Cns# date ; mtr --report{,-wide,-cycles=600} --interval 0.1 --order "SRL
> BGAWV" -4 ????c????????.indiana.edu ; date
>
Using a 1/10th of a second interval is rather anti-social.
I know we rate-limit ICMP traffic down, and such a
short interval would be detected as attack traffic,
and treated as such.
I would take any results you get from such probes
with a grain of salt. What results do you get with
a more sane interval, one of at least 1 second or
more?
Matt
