How about SMP Affinity in CCR? System > Resources > IRQ.
2013/12/27 Andre Tomt <andre-na...@tomt.net> > On 27. des. 2013 17:26, Jim Shankland wrote: > <snip> > > Routing table size was completely not an issue in our environment; we >> were looking at a number of concurrent flows in the high-5 to >> low-6-digit range, and since Linux uses a route cache, it was that >> number, rather than the number of full tables we carried, that was >> important. >> > <snip> > > FYI, Linux no longer has a routing cache, so any performance numbers with > the cache in place is void on modern kernels. It was deemed too fragile, > handled mixed traffic badly, and was way easy to DoS. It wasnt simply just > ripped out of course, the full lookups was made way faster and a bunch of > scalability issues got plugged in the process. > > All in all, in PPS, Linux should now handle mixed traffic much better, but > less diverse traffic patterns might be a little slower than before. > However, all in all, much more consistent and predictable. > > Not everything is peachy though, there are still some cases that sucked > last I checked. Running tons of tunnels beeing one. Multicast rx was > severely gimped for a while after the removal, but that got fixed. > > -- Eduardo Schoedler