----- Original Message ----- > From: "joel jaeggli" <joe...@bogus.com>
> > As I've noted, I'm not sure I believe that's true of current generation > > gear, and if it *is*, then it should cost manufacturers business. > > There are boxes that haven't aged out of the network yet where that's an > issue, some are more datacenter-centric than others. force10 e1200 was > one platform that had this limitation for example. So making sure manufacturers are producing gear that's BCP38-compliant, and buyers have it on their tick-list, is still a productive goal, too. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
