Thus spake Keegan Holley (no.s...@comcast.net) on Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:49:19AM -0500: > I wasn’t saying just fix it. I was saying that router configs don’t lend > well to versioning.
Um, what? $> rlog r-cssc-b280c-1-core.conf | grep 'total revision' total revisions: 2009; selected revisions: 2009 > When it’s a router config chances are someone fat-fingered something. Most > of the time the best thing to do is to fix or at least alert on the error, > not to record it as a valid config version. We have our operators manually check in revisions (think in rcs terms: co -l router, go do work, verify it, ci -u router) rather than unsolicited / cron-triggered checkins. Then the check-in message contains the operator's description text of the change and often a ticket number. So there slightly fewer fat-finger configs checked in. Dale
