Hi all, Le 23/03/2014 20:13, Mark Tinka a écrit : > On Sunday, March 23, 2014 09:05:54 PM Cb B wrote: > >> i would say the more appropriate place for this policy is >> the printer, not a firewall. For example, maybe a >> printer should only be ULA or LLA by default. >> > > I would support adding security at the host-level, > especially because with a centralized firewall, internal > infrastructure is usually left wide open to internal staff, > with trust being the rope we all hang on to to keep things > running. >
When speaking of IPv6 deployment, I routinely hear about host security. I feel like it should be stated that this is *in no way* an IPv6 issue. May the device be ULA, LLA, GUA or RFC1918-addressed, the device is at risk anyway. If this is the only argument for delaying IPv6 deployment, this sounds more like FUD to me ;-) Denis