Plus I guarantee that something this SIGNIFICANT would catch the attention of many tech news outlets, social sites, and many email lists if they had given due notice and allowed people time to digest the change. But, I guess since everything except their email has become pretty much irrelevant these days, they had to do something to get attention and try to be the big bully again.
I personally run only a couple of small email lists in which the subscribers are specifically added by me when someone wants on, and this has caused us, because the submitter has a long time Yahoo email address and will not change, a huge headache. The sender has had to resort to sending email from Yahoo account multiple time in order to get the emails out to the 180+ subscribers. Some people cannot change their email due to having it for so long it is just not practical. Only other work around I have for this user is to give them a private email list on the email server where he can send from that is not a Yahoo address. This causes extra work because every email he wants to forward on, he must now first send it to the new private address, then login to the private email address web mail, then forward. I have to agree with this others out there that Yahoo SHOULD, not COULD, have handled this a lot better. All the other big ISP's out there should be whipping Yahoo's a$$ about right now. But as usual, not a peep! Robert -----Original Message----- From: Miles Fidelman [mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 5:28 PM Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: DMARC -> CERT? Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Scott Howard <sc...@doc.net.au> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Christopher Morrow >> <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Matthias Leisi <matth...@leisi.net> >>> wrote: >>>> They could have communicated, as in "listen folks, we are going to >>>> make a critical change that will affect mailing lists (etc...) in >>>> four weeks time". >>> communicated it where? >> >> "The Internet". > I was trying, really, to be not-funny with my question. > > if you're going to do something that has the potential to affect (say, > for example) email to a wide set of people, most of which are NOT your > direct users, how do you go about making that public? > > 'the internet' isn't really a good answer for 'how do you notify'. > Doug's note that: "email mailops" is good... but I'm not sure how many > people that run lists listen to mailops? (I don't ... i don't run any > big list, but...) > > I also wonder about update cycles for software in this realm? and for > very larger list operators there's probably some customization and > such to hurdle over on the upgrade path, eh? so how much leadtime is > enough? how much is too much? 1yr seems like a long time - people will > forget, 1wk doesn't seem like enough to avoid firedrills and > un-intended bugs. > >> A blog entry and a post to a few key relevant mailing lists would have > specifically which mail-lists? > > How about the support lists for all the email list packages they could think of - let's start with mailman, majordomo, listserve, listproc, sympa, ezmlm, ..... Might have been nice if they'd offered some support for patching the open source ones. Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
