On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote: > On 4/17/14 11:51 AM, "William Herrin" <b...@herrin.us> wrote: >>Also, I note your draft is entitled "Requirements for IPv6 Enterprise >>Firewalls." Frankly, no "enterprise" firewall will be taken seriously >>without address-overloaded NAT. I realize that's a controversial >>statement in the IPv6 world but until you get past it you're basically >>wasting your time on a document which won't be useful to industry. > > You've said this before, and it is still an absurdly over-broad statement.
Hi Lee, That tends to happen when one takes a nuanced topic involving the intersection of technology with human social behavior and boils it down to two sentences. Perhaps I could have said, "taken seriously by enough of your target audience without." Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
