On Saturday, May 03, 2014 07:24:24 PM Vitkovský Adam wrote:

> Sure it's a different transport protocol altogether,
> anyways It's interesting to see how everybody tends to
> separate the IPv4 and IPv6 AFs onto a different TCP
> sessions and still run the plethora of other AFs on the
> common v4 TCP session, maybe apart from couple of the
> big folks, who can afford running separate control-plane
> and edge infrastructure for some of the AFs, IPv6 AF
> being the first ran separately.

We run separate AF's for each family-type, i.e., IPv4 
separate from IPv6, separate from VPNv4 separate from BGP-
based VPLS, e.t.c.

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to