I've seen various communities attempt to hand out free wifi - usually in
limited areas, but in some cases community-wide (Brookline, MA comes to
mind). The limited ones (e.g., in tourist hotspots) have been city
funded, or donated. The community-wide ones, that I've seen, have been
public-private partnerships - the City provides space on light poles and
such - the private firm provides limited access, in hopes of selling
expanded service. I haven't seen it work successfully - 4G cell service
beats the heck out of WiFi as a metropolitan area service.
When it comes to municipal fiber and triple-play projects, I've
generally seen them capitalized with revenue bonds -- hence, a need for
revenue to pay of the financing. Lower cost than commercial services
because municipal bonds are low-interest, long-term, and they operate on
a cost-recovery basis.
Miles Fidelman
Aaron wrote:
Do you have an example of a municipality that gives free internet
access to it's residents?
On 7/21/2014 2:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
I think the difference is when the municipality starts throwing in
free or highly subsidized layer 3 connectivity "free with every layer
1 connection"
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Blake Dunlap <iki...@gmail.com> wrote:
My power is pretty much always on, my water is pretty much always on
and safe, my sewer system works, etc etc...
Why is layer 1 internet magically different from every other utility?
-Blake
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:38 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us>
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jay Ashworth <j...@baylink.com>
wrote:
Over the last decade, 19 states have made it illegal for
municipalities
to own fiber networks
Hi Jay,
Everything government does, it does badly. Without exception. There
are many things government does better than any private organization
is likely to sustain, but even those things it does slowly and at an
exorbitant price.
Muni fiber is a competition killer. You can't beat city hall; once
built it's not practical to compete, even with better service, so
residents are stuck with only the overpriced (either directly or via
taxes), usually underpowered and always one-size-fits-all network
access which results. As an ISP I watched something similar happen in
Altoona PA a decade and a half ago. It was a travesty.
The only exception I see to this would be if localities were
constrained to providing point to point and point to multipoint
communications infrastructure within the locality on a reasonable and
non-discriminatory basis. The competition that would foster on the
services side might outweigh the damage on the infrastructure side.
Like public roads facilitate efficient transportation and freight
despite the cost and potholes, though that's an imperfect simile.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra