On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:33:28 -0000, "McElearney, Kevin" said: > (w/ a level of quality). <$IP_PROVIDER> plays a big role in delivering > your *overall* Internet experience, but eyecandysource plays an even > bigger role delivering your *specific* eyecandy experience. If > eyecandystore has internal challenges, business negotiation/policy > objectives, or uses poor adaptive routing path decisions, this has a > direct and material impact to your *specific* eyecandy experience (and > some have found fixable by hiding your source IP with a VPN).
Very true. But what we're discussing here is the *specific* case where eyecandystore's biggest challenge at delivering the experience is an external challenge, namely that $IP_PROVIDER's service sucks. It's particularly galling when $IP_PROVIDER's internal net is actually up to snuff, but they engage in shakedown tactics to upgrade peering points.
pgpPjoDpSRlPb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
