I've been really happy with the Fiberstore muxes/demuxes, although I'm using CWDM not DWDM.
They do the job, are entirely passive (no power needed), perform well (real world losses seem to match the test reports to a tee), seem solid enough, and this sort of stuff doesn't get any cheaper (that I've found). If you are looking for a 'platform', with _any_ sort of bells or whistles, they aren't what you are looking for. but, if you just want a cheap way to squeeze multiple channels onto a strand or two, they rock. --Eric On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Romeo Czumbil <rczum...@xand.com> wrote: > Check out Ekinops > They have been rock solid with me. They are not as expensive as the others > and there's no switching in the backplane. Everything happens on the module > cards > http://www.ekinops.net > > > > > > > Romeo Czumbil > Sr. Network Engineer > > > 1000 Adams Ave | Norristown, PA 19403 > tel 610-994-3046 | cell 609-220-0322 > rczum...@xand.com > > website | news | blog | data centers > > Confidentiality Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and > may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, > be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail > or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this > copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth McRae > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:59 PM > To: NANOG > Subject: Optical Transport Platform > > Greetings Everyone.. > > Here is one for the transport/backbone/data center guys. Can you tell > which manufactures you like for optical transport? I am looking for a > solution to provide 8 channels of DWDM using tuned optics in my network > gear. DWDM transport will be used for multiplexing only (no amplification > or wavelength generation). So far, I have been looking at Fiberstore and > PacketLight.. > > Any suggestions? > > All feedback is greatly appreciated! > > Thanks > > Kenneth >