And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sterling
>Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 12:06
>To: Bacon Zombie
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR
>
>Again, you're focusing resentment towards someone who did the right
>thing. Negative reinforcement will discourage others from taking
>action and will discourage them from encouraging others to take
>action.
>
>Let's focus on who still has vulnerable equipment and how to help
>them. Let's not shame people who did the right thing
>
>Thanks,
>Dan
>
>
>On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Bacon Zombie <baconzom...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> OK thank you for decommissioning this.*
>>
>> * Only if you either had authority to do so for max 1 year or had no
>> authority but were fighting to have it patches or replaced for years.
>> On Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM, "Daniel Sterling" <sterling.dan...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie <baconzom...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
>>>
>>> Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
>>>
>>> Can someone from cisco set up a poll or release whatever numbers they
>>> have about how many of these old devices are still in service?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dan
>>>
