On 05/10/14 18:44, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: >> The *real* problem isn't the testing. >> It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this >> data. >> Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if >> there's a > > At least "name and shame" is something more useful than nothing done.
Has it worked for the deaggregation offenders named by the CIDR report?
