there's a reason why cisco introduced "service unsupported-transceiver", which still remains an undocumented command. i have arista gear as well. kinda wish they had a similar undocumented command.
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical ... William Herrin
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical ... Justin M. Streiner
- Re: A case against vendor-locking opti... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: A case against vendor-locking... Justin M. Streiner
- RE: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Jethro R Binks
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules William Herrin
- RE: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Darden, Patrick
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Scott Voll
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Clayton Zekelman
- RE: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Naslund, Steve
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modu... ryanL
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical ... Ken Matlock
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical ... Jérôme Nicolle
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical ... Naslund, Steve
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Justin M. Streiner
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Nick Hilliard
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modu... Jérôme Nicolle
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical ... Ryan Pugatch
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Max Tulyev
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Baldur Norddahl