On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:54:32 AM Jeff Tantsura wrote: > You don't need LDP on RR as long as clients support "not > on lsp" flag (different implementation have different > names for it)
The hack needed when running a Junos-based RR in an MPLS network to allow route reflection of l3vpn routes on an RR not running MPLS. For IOS and IOS XE (and IOS XR, I think), this wouldn't be needed as unlike Juniper, Cisco don't treat MPLS signaling protocols as (pseudo) routing protocols. > There are more and more reasons to run RR > on a non router HW, there are many reasons to still run > commercial code base, mostly feature set and resilience. +1. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.