On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:29:33 +0700, "Roland Dobbins" said: > > On 11 Jan 2015, at 22:21, Mike Hammett wrote: > > > I'm not saying what you're doing is wrong, I'm saying whatever the > > industry as a whole is doing obviously isn't working and perhaps a > > different approach is required. > > You haven't recommended anything new, and you really need to do some > reading in order to understand why it isn't as simple as you seem to > think it is.
Sounds like RFC1925, section 4 should be top of the list?
pgpN98tKGHe8R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
