and then there are the loons who will locally push /64 or longer, some of which may leak.
even if things were sane & nothing longer than a /32 were to be in the table, are we not looking at the functional equivalent of v4 host routes? /bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 19February2015Thursday, at 19:07, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > in a discussion with some fellow researchers, the subject of ipv6 > deaggregation arose; will it be less or more than we see in ipv4? > > in http://archive.psg.com/jsac-deagg.pdf it was thought that > multi-homing, traffic engineering, and the /24 pollution disease were > the drivers. multi-homing seems to be increasing, while the other two > were stable as a relative measure to total growth. > > so, at first blush, we thought v6 would be about the same as v4. > > but then we considered that v6 allocations seem to be /32s, and the > longest propagating route seems to be /48, leaving 16 bits with which > the deaggregators can play. while in v4 it was /24s out of a /19 or > /20, four or five bits. > > this does not bode well. > > randy