The most important point is yes, that no one cares. If people wanted it, it 
would be sold to them. End. of. story. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Steve Naslund" <snasl...@medline.com> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>, "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> 
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 1:19:29 PM 
Subject: RE: Symmetry, DSL, and all that 


>The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5 
>gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE. 
> 
> 

Truth is, once the user is achieving what they consider to be acceptable 
performance they don't care if it is symmetric or not. 

> 
> 
>Not a very informative discussion. 
> 
>Points of fact... 
> 
>From Verizon's January filings regarding 2014Q4: 
> 
>1. Verizon has about eight million FIOS customers. 
>2. "Fifty-nine percent of FiOS consumer Internet customers subscribed to data 
>speeds of at least 50Mbps, up from 46 percent one year earlier." 
> 

Eight million FIOS customers does not even come close to representing the bulk 
of users out there. In fact, it does not even represent the majority of "high 
speed" customers out there. 

>From a Verizon press release last summer, all FIOS speeds are now symmetric. 

And no one cares. I don't even see Verizon commercials crowing about how great 
it is to have symmetry. If customers loved it that much don't you think they 
would market that way? 

> 
>http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/07/verizon-fios-finally-symmetrical-upload-speeds-boosted-to-match-download/
> 
> 
>ADSL development proceeded the development of the consumer Internet. The 
>original patent was filed in 1988. DSL was designed originally to deliver 
>video in an ISDN/ATM world. For that reason, it was asymmetric. 

ADSL did not proceed the development of the consumer Internet in the commercial 
world. If it did, we would never have gone with dial-up modems. Patent dates 
have very little to do with commercial availability at all. Please give me an 
example of a purchasable service using ADSL prior to its use in Internet 
delivery. The number one reason ADSL succeeded and SDSL did not.....you could 
put an ADSL signal on the phone line you already had in your house, SDSL 
required a new loop to be ordered. Faster to provision and it can be done 
without a truck roll. 

Steven Naslund 
Chicago IL 




Reply via email to