On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matt...@matthew.at> wrote:
> 1) An all-IPv6 network inside, so the hosts can all talk to each other over
> IPv6 without using (potentially overlapping copies of) RFC1918 space...


this point keeps coming up... I don't see that 'overlapping ipv4'
matters at all here. it is presented to the customer (vm oeprator) as
'a flat-ish lan' where you poke from machine to machine via names.

(so it seems like a rathole/FUD-problem we can just stop talking about now)

-chris

Reply via email to