On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:59:47 +1000, Karl Auer said: > On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 11:48 +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > > With stateful DHCPv6 addressing, we're back to using NAT again. > > Hope the question doesn't make me look like an idiot, but why does using > stateful DHCPv6 mean having to go back to NAT?
How does the device ask for a *second* DHCPv6'ed address for tethering or whatever?
pgp95dCgIgJlN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
