On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:54 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > Okay, granted you can probably cover your corner case here with a > priority 20 MX that leads to a unicast address on one of the two > servers. SMTP can let the rare fellow with the bisected packet flow > gracefully fall back.
but 'well behaved smtp clients' should already be falling back right?
