You'll find as well, a lot of hosts (eg, I know at least Windows XP) won't forward to Class E destinations.
-Tom On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Ray Soucy <r...@maine.edu> wrote: > There is already more than enough address space allocated for NAT, you > don't need to start using random prefixes that may or may not be needed for > other purposes in the future. > > For all we know, tomorrow someone could write an RFC requesting an address > reserved for local anycast DNS and it could be assigned from this block. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Luan Nguyen <lngu...@opsource.net> wrote: > >> Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it? >> Just for NATTING on Cisco gears... >> > > > > -- > Ray Patrick Soucy > Network Engineer > University of Maine System > > T: 207-561-3526 > F: 207-561-3531 > > MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network > www.maineren.net
