On 9/Jul/15 18:53, Matthew Huff wrote: > > If an ISP wants to give out a /48, great for them. If they want to give out > only a /56, I say that's fine. What's more important to me is that they > implement IPv6. Arguing about prefix size and SLAAC vs DHCP rather than just > go ahead and implement things, to me is just silly. When IP was first > deployed, we didn't have DHCP (bootp was still in it's infancy), no mDNS, > etc...Lots of things grew up after the fact. I agree that we can't foresee > what will happen in the future, but that to me just proves my point. Worrying > about the ability to create complex topologies in home networks that may or > may not ever be needed or wanted just seems absurd to me.
I tend to agree. Let's just go out and do it and choose from what others are doing. Some are doing /48, others are doing /56. Some are doing /64, even though we all know that is not very good for obvious reasons, but... ... let's just get going. Mark.
