Nor will the fact that your particular trunking provider is local, so I’m not 
sure what you seek to accomplish, then.

Owen

> On Jul 23, 2015, at 12:24 , Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> 
> I have several Asterisk VMs running in my own facility, but that doesn't 
> change the fact that a particular provider's media gateway that SIP reinvites 
> me to is somewhere non-local. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com> 
> To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> 
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org 
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 8:04:24 AM 
> Subject: Re: SIP trunking providers 
> 
> Why not set up a small Asterisk box in a local datacenter and only trunk out 
> the non-local calls? 
> 
> Owen 
> 
>> On Jul 20, 2015, at 03:36 , Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: 
>> 
>> I want the gateway in Chicago as well. 
>> 
>> I am Chicago based. The end users are Chicago based. Therefore the 
>> origination would be coming from a Chicago area gateway. Half of the calls 
>> (inbound would be guaranteed to be local as they'd be coming in through a 
>> local tandem anyway. Most of the termination traffic would again be to local 
>> numbers, therefore would again have to be through local tandems. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- 
>> Mike Hammett 
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> http://www.ics-il.com 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> 
>> From: "Nathan Anderson" <nath...@fsr.com> 
>> To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> 
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org 
>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 4:11:37 AM 
>> Subject: RE: SIP trunking providers 
>> 
>> Maybe I'm missing something here, but what does it matter if the RTP from 
>> your perspective ends in Chicago or not? If it does end in Chicago, that 
>> only means they are proxying the audio before sending it on to the actual 
>> media gateway for that call where it finally drops onto the PSTN. So all 
>> that happens is that the audio latency remains the same (or worse, because 
>> of the additional, unnecessary proxy) AND that the actual media gateway 
>> remains hidden from you. You won't be able to actually test and see the 
>> latency to the MG, and you will be under the (false) impression that latency 
>> across all calls is equally "good" because you are only measuring RTT to a 
>> specific and common media proxy. By sending the audio directly to an MG 
>> closer to the point of exit from IP-land, it is taking a more direct route 
>> to the callee than you are seemingly asking for. 
>> 
>> If you're not talking about adding a proxy to the equation, are you 
>> expecting to find a provider in Chicago that immediately goes from IP to 
>> PSTN within Chicago, regardless of the actual destination of the call? 
>> Circuit-switched TDM is not a no-latency connection. Physics is involved 
>> here. The farther apart the caller is from the callee, the more latency 
>> there will be, regardless of the medium. All other things being equal 
>> (similar network path, etc.), I doubt IP packet switching significantly 
>> increases the latency over and above TDM call trunking. But I'm not an 
>> expert, and again, if I'm missing something here, I would love to be proven 
>> wrong. 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Nathan Anderson 
>> First Step Internet, LLC 
>> nath...@fsr.com 
>> 
>> ________________________________________ 
>> From: NANOG [nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
>> [na...@ics-il.net] 
>> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 1:04 PM 
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org 
>> Subject: Re: SIP trunking providers 
>> 
>> I too am looking for the Chicago area. Low volume. I'm looking for people 
>> whose SIP and RTP hit the end of the road in Chicago. Not interested in 
>> someone whose SIP servers are in LA , but will redirect me to the nearest 
>> gateway... without telling me where said gateway is. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- 
>> Mike Hammett 
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> http://www.ics-il.com 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> 
>> From: "Rafael Possamai" <raf...@gav.ufsc.br> 
>> To: nanog@nanog.org 
>> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 4:40:48 PM 
>> Subject: SIP trunking providers 
>> 
>> Would anyone in the list be able to recommend a SIP trunk provider in the 
>> Chicago area? Not a VoIP expert, so just looking for someone with previous 
>> experience. 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Rafael 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to