I have AT&T u-verse small business connection at my office with a
static IP setup, and my experience matches with the AT&T tech said.
We have a separate router behind the AT&T router. The AT&T router is
an Arris (former Motorola) NVG595. Our router has a static IP out of
our subnet and does NAT for the office network.
As far as I can tell, the u-verse supplied router cannot be replaced
with something less sucky. The problem is getting the 802.1x
certificate needed to authenticate on the wan port.
I dislike AT&T's hardware as it has more limitations than just this,
but some of those limitations can be worked around with an additional
router downstream of it.
Quoting Keith Stokes <kei...@neilltech.com>:
I’m wondering if some can share their experiences or maybe there’s
an AT&T person here who can confirm policy.
I work for SaaS provider who requires a source IP to access our
system to businesses.
Normally we tell the customer to request a “Static IP” from their
provider. That term makes sense to most ISPs.
However, we’ve recently worked with an AT&T higher-up tech who told
us that every U-Verse modem is locked to an address even when set to
DHCP and will not change unless the unit is changed. Ordering a
“Static IP” from them means your devices will individually get
public addresses, which isn’t a requirement for us, isn’t quite as
easy to add multiple devices and costs our customers more money.
Here are my questions:
1. Is it really accurate that the customer’s address is tied to the
modem/router?
2. For my curiosity, is this done through a DHCP reservation or is
there a hard coded entry somewhere?
3. Do all U-Verse modem/routers behave the same way? This particular
unit was a Motorola but the friends I’ve seen with U-Verse use a
Cisco unit.
---
Keith Stokes