----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Helms" <khe...@zcorum.com>
> On Aug 4, 2015 9:38 AM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Scott Helms <khe...@zcorum.com> > > wrote: > > > With the (large) caveat that heterogenous networks are more > > > subject to human error in many cases. > > > > <cough>automate!</cough> > Automation just means your mistake goes many more places more quickly. Not necessarily. The sort of failure you're talking about, Scott, is "user did the wrong thing", and sure, automation makes it easier for that to spread. Chris was, though, I think, suggesting automating around "user tries to do the right thing on disjoint devices, and fails *because they're disjoint*"; that is, clearly, a problem automation can help with. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
