EoIP seems to be what I am looking for, however this recent Mikrotik session says:
EoIP could be a solution for tunneling L2 over L3. • EoIP disadvantages: – Fragmentation of L2 frames over multiple L3 packets – Performance issues • VPLS advantages: – No fragmentation. – 60% more performance then EoIP. So it sounds like VPLS might be better than EoIP? I can't find much about EoIP online, so is this a Mikrotik only protocol? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jürgen Jaritsch <j...@anexia.at> wrote: > Hi, > > Mikrotik Routerboard + (encrypted) Ethernet over IP (EoIP). If required: > MPLS+OSPF+BGP in the EoIP for additional features. > > Build the pseudo Layer2 with two dedicated boxes. In the HQ you can hand > it over directly to the MX80 and at the new office you can work with small > boxes like Cisco 7301 (also available with redundant PS) or if you need > more ports: 19xx ... > > #) cheap setup > #) can easily transport a few hundred Meg > #) you can use refurb parts if required > #) big community support for Mikrotik Routerboards > #) encrypted transport possible > #) works with dynamic IPs > #) MPLS in the EoIP allows you to transport VRFs with BGP signaling > > Etc etc > > Best regards > > > Jürgen Jaritsch > Head of Network & Infrastructure > > ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH > > Telefon: +43-5-0556-300 > Telefax: +43-5-0556-500 > > E-Mail: j...@anexia.at > Web: http://www.anexia.at > > Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt > Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler > Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT > U63216601 > > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Colton Conor [colton.co...@gmail.com] > *Received:* Dienstag, 11 Aug. 2015, 20:23 > *To:* NANOG [nanog@nanog.org] > *Subject:* Branch Location Over The Internet > > We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber > connections, its own ASN, its own /22 IP block from ARIN, and a couple of > gigabit internet connections from multiple providers. The office is taking > full BGP routes from tier 1 providers using a Juniper MX80. > > They are establishing their first branch location, and need the branch > location to be able to securely communicate back to headquarters, AND be > able to use a /24 of headquarters public IP addresses. Ideally the device > at the HQ location would hand out public IP address using DHCP to the other > side of the tunnel at the branch location. > > We know that in an ideal world it would be wise to get layer 2 transport > connections from HQ to the branch location, but lets assume that is not an > option. Please don't flood this thread about how it could be an option > because it's not at this time. This setup will be temporary and in service > for the next year until we get fiber to the branch site. > > Let's assume at the branch location we can get a DOCSIS cable internet > connection from a incumbent cable provider such as Comcast, and that > provider will give us a couple static IP address. Assume as a backup, we > have a PPPoE DSL connection from the ILEC such as Verizon who gives us a > dynamic IP address. > > What solution could we put at the HQ site and the branch site to achieve > this? Ideally we would want the solution to load balance between the > connections based on the connections speeds, and failover if one is down. > The cable connection will be much faster speed (probably 150Mbps down and > 10 Upload) compared to the DSL connection (10 download and 1 upload). If we > need more speed we can upgrade the cable modem to a higher package, but for > DSL that is the max speed so we might have to get multiple DSL lines. The > cable solution could always be used as the primary, and the DSL connection > could only be used as backup if that makes things easier. > > If you were to do this with Juniper or Cisco gear what would you have at > each location? What technology would you use? > > I know there is Pepewave and a couple of other software solutions that seem > to have a proprietary load balancing solutions developed, but I would > prefer to use a common Cisco or Juniper solution if one exists. > > There will be 50 users at the branch office. There is only one branch > location at this time, but they might expand to a couple more but under 10. >
