you can try to get some financials (probably poor technical) view on DDOS :
http://www.infonetics.com/pr/2014/1H14-DDoS-Prevention-Appliances-Market-Highlights.asp
The DDOS prevention Appliances report is not free, and I doubt it's
really technical :-)
But at least you could know what your financial guys might think. Could
help you if you want to convince them to buy Arbor :-).
- Marcel
On 12.08.2015 16:28, Ramy Hashish wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
From: "marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr" <marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
Message-ID: <55c992de.3020...@yahoo.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
anybody from this impressive list ?:
https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
-- Marcel
Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the
market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?
Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?
Thanks,
Ramy
