Hi,

FYI, newer linecard models from BROCADE can hold 2 million routes. Probably 
others can do that now too.

Disclaimer : I'm not working for them or defending them, just setting an 
information straight.

My 2 cents.



> Le 3 oct. 2015 à 10:33, Jürgen Jaritsch <j...@anexia.at> a écrit :
> 
> As mentioned before: even the new SUP2T from Cisco is limited to 1Mio routes 
> ...
> 
> There are MANY other vendors with the same limitations: Juniper, Brocade, etc
> 
> And the solt equipment is not the 99USD trash from the super market at the 
> corner ...
> 
> 
> Jürgen Jaritsch
> Head of Network & Infrastructure
> 
> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
> 
> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
> 
> E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
> Web: http://www.anexia.at
> 
> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max Tulyev [max...@netassist.ua]
> Received: Samstag, 03 Okt. 2015, 9:11
> To: nanog@nanog.org [nanog@nanog.org]
> Subject: Re: AW: /27 the new /24
> 
> Which routers? DIR-300 with OpenWRT/Quagga? :)
> 
> I think all above-the-trash level routers supports >1M routes, isn't it?
> 
>> On 02.10.15 17:45, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> this would at least help to get rid of many old routing engines around the 
>> world :) ... or people would keep their "learn nothing smaller than /24" 
>> filters in place. Also an option - but not for companies who act as an IP 
>> transit provider.
>> 
>> 
>> best regards
>> 
>> Jürgen Jaritsch
>> Head of Network & Infrastructure
>> 
>> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>> 
>> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
>> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
>> 
>> E-Mail: jjarit...@anexia-it.com
>> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com
>> 
>> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
>> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
>> 
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Justin Wilson - 
>> MTIN
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 02. Oktober 2015 16:32
>> An: NANOG
>> Betreff: /27 the new /24
>> 
>> I was in a discussion the other day and several Tier2 providers were talking 
>> about the idea of adjusting their BGP filters to accept prefixes smaller 
>> than a /24.  A few were saying they thought about going down to as small as 
>> a /27.  This was mainly due to more networks coming online and not having 
>> even a /24 of IPv4 space.  The first argument is against this is the 
>> potential bloat the global routing table could have.  Many folks have worked 
>> hard for years to summarize and such. others were saying they would do a /26 
>> or bigger.
>> 
>> However, what do we do about the new networks which want to do BGP but only 
>> can get small allocations from someone (either a RIR or one of their 
>> upstreams)?
>> 
>> Just throwing that out there. Seems like an interesting discussion.
>> 
>> 
>> Justin Wilson
>> j...@mtin.net
>> 
>> ---
>> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
>> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
>> 
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
>> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
> 

Reply via email to