Not protocols as much as less secure ssl ciphers is my guess --srs
> On 23-Oct-2015, at 9:50 PM, Jay Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> > >> Incoming settings >> IMAP server: imap.gmail.com >> Port: 993 >> Security type: SSL (always) >> >> Outgoing settings >> SMTP server: smtp.gmail.com >> Port: 465 >> Security type: SSL (always) > > Hijack: to use k9mail with gmail IMAP, I have to enable "allow less secure > clients" in the gmail web UI, but neither the Gmail people nor the k9mail > people seem to want to actually document which protocol is disliked or > required. > > Anyone have any actual facts on this point? > > Cheers, > -- jra > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink > j...@baylink.com > Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274