Thanks for the tips. All good info. Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Kraig Beahn <kr...@enguity.com> wrote: > > I believe Scott, just hit the nail on the head... > "but keep in mind that it's normal for people who have > had to fulfill a request *to be disallowed from talking about it* which > makes > them seem even more rare than they actually are." > >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Scott Helms <khe...@zcorum.com> wrote: >> >> Kevin, >> >> That's largely true, but keep in mind that it's normal for people who have >> had to fulfill a request to be disallowed from talking about it which makes >> them seem even more rare than they actually are. I'm also not familiar >> with any laws that prevent state or local agencies from leveraging CALEA >> and I've certainly seen it used on the voice side by state level law >> enforcement. >> >> >> Scott Helms >> Chief Technology Officer >> ZCorum >> (678) 507-5000 >> -------------------------------- >> http://twitter.com/kscotthelms >> -------------------------------- >> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Kevin Burke <kbu...@burlingtontelecom.com >> wrote: >> >>> Ignore it until you get the paperwork. The local law enforcement can not >>> get a warrant for the real time, full data capture. Only FBI or other >>> national agencies can get those subpeona's. We went through this with >> our >>> local police department. They wanted to make sure we were prepared and >>> wanted a test for the real time number capture on phone calls. They >> didn't >>> mention they don't have any equipment on their side to connect the T1. >>> >>> Ask your local neighbors. Some area's have a number of local federal >>> investigations. If you get the deer in the headlights look from your >>> competition then you may never get one of these. >>> >>> The full data captures are rare. >>> >>> Kevin Burke >>> 802-540-0979 >>> Burlington Telecom - City of Burlington >>> 200 Church St, Burlington, VT 05401 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lorell >> Hathcock >>> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 4:47 PM >>> To: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org> >>> Subject: CALEA Requirements >>> >>> NANOG: >>> >>> >>> >>> Can someone point me to the current CALEA requirements? >>> >>> >>> >>> As an ISP, should I be recording all internet traffic that passes my >>> routers? Or do I only have to record when and if I receive a court >> order? >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm not under any court order now, I just want to be sure that I am >>> compliant going forward in my capabilities. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> Lorell Hathcock >>
