On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:

> No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
> cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also
> end up using far, far less fiber strands.
>

I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on
forever...

Lord knows I've been having it since 2008.

Mark.

Reply via email to