Yes. Many vendors are using l2vpn/pseudo-wire services of one sort or another to provide circuits and most do not transport LACP by default.
LACP uses slow-protocols address: https://wiki.wireshark.org/LinkAggregationControlProtocol If they are using ALU gear, they can enable this using the port command: configure port <port> ethernet lacp-tunnel On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:08 AM Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > What is performing the LACP? The Level3 transport system for the most part > is purley optical, so I don't think it touches LACP. Did you check the hash > values? > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG < > nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Nanog-ers, > > Hoping someone may have come across a similar issue. Has anyone ever seen > > a situation where maybe like a Level3 transport system could be possibly > > dropping LACP frames..? > > End point A - tx and rx counts incrementing for LACP > > LACP info: Role System System Port Port > > Port priority identifier priority > > number key et-0/0/0.0 Actor 127 5c:45:27:6d:2a:c0 > > 127 56 16 et-0/0/0.0 Partner 1 > 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > 127 56 16 LACP Statistics: LACP Rx LACP Tx > > Unknown Rx Illegal Rx et-0/0/0.0 6925 > 6922 > > 0 0 > > End Point B - no RX, partner macs are 0s.. > > LACP info: Role System System Port Port > > Port priority identifier priority > > number key et-9/1/0.0 Actor 127 5c:45:27:77:d6:c4 > > 127 68 16 et-9/1/0.0 Partner 1 > 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > 1 68 16 LACP Statistics: LACP Rx LACP Tx > > Unknown Rx Illegal Rx et-9/1/0.0 0 6752 > > 0 0 > > Link works fine otherwise outside the aggregate and w/o LACP. Any inputs > > will be greatly appreciated. > > thanks, > > -nevin > > >
