Wouldn't the /56 get blocked as soon as Netflix detects multiple accounts logging in from the same IPv6 range?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a good idea. We should do this. > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:48 PM Raymond Beaudoin < > raymond.beaud...@icarustech.com> wrote: > > > Make it a /56 each and you've got a deal. Hell, I'll throw in a round of > > drinks. > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> We should crowdsource a /40 and split it up into /64's for each of us. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM Matthew Kaufman <matt...@matthew.at> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > If early adopter PI IPv6 was the same price as early adopter PI v4 > >> space, > >> > my wife would be totally on board with this solution. > >> > > >> > Matthew Kaufman > >> > > >> > (Sent from my iPhone) > >> > > >> > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Spencer Ryan <sr...@arbor.net> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Well if you have PI space just use HE's BGP tunnel offerings. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net > >> > > *Arbor Networks* > >> > > +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) > >> > > www.arbornetworks.com > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Raymond Beaudoin < > >> > > raymond.beaud...@icarustech.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> As an alternative, there are multiple cloud service offerings that > >> will > >> > >> advertise your IPv6 allocations on your behalf direct to a server > in > >> > their > >> > >> data centers. It seems pretty tongue-in-cheek, and satisfying, to > >> turn > >> > >> up a *<insert > >> > >> favorite virtual router instance> *and then route through it. The > >> > Internet > >> > >> is such an amazing place. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Cryptographrix < > >> > cryptograph...@gmail.com> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Yeah I RAWRed to them pretty hard whilst being as understanding to > >> the > >> > CS > >> > >>> rep that it wasn't their fault. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> They thought I was weird as anything. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> If there are any Verizon FiOS network engineers on the thread, a > >> fellow > >> > >>> Verizon employee would thank you kindly for an off-thread email > >> > regarding > >> > >>> BGP advertisement (I'll buy the IPv6 block and the > drink-of-choice, > >> you > >> > >>> configure my account to listen for route advertisement). > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Strange that it has to come to this to get "legit" IPv6 service. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:08 PM Raymond Beaudoin < > >> > >>> raymond.beaud...@icarustech.com> wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>>> I wasn't originally affected on my he.net tunnel, but this > >> evening it > >> > >>>> started blocking. The recommended ACLs are a functional temporary > >> > >>>> workaround, but I've also opened a request with Netflix. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Mark T. Ganzer < > >> > gan...@spawar.navy.mil> > >> > >>>> wrote: > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>>> So far I am not seeing a Netflix block on my he.net tunnel > yet. I > >> > >>>> connect > >> > >>>>> to the Los Angeles node, so maybe not all of HE's address space > is > >> > >> being > >> > >>>>> blocked. > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> Not going to be disabling IPv6 here either. + HAD native IPv6 > from > >> > >> Time > >> > >>>>> Warner, but they decided to in their wisdom to disable IPv6 > >> service > >> > >> for > >> > >>>>> anyone that has an Arris SB6183 due to an Arris firmware bug. > And > >> > >> they > >> > >>>> are > >> > >>>>> taking their sweet time pushing out the fixed firmware update > that > >> > >>>> Comcast > >> > >>>>> and Cox seemed to be able to push to their customers last fall. > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> -Mark Ganzer > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>> On 6/3/2016 4:49 PM, Cryptographrix wrote: > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> Depends - how many US users have native IPv6 through their > ISPs? > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> If I remember correctly (I can't find the source at the > moment), > >> > >> HE.net > >> > >>>>>> represents something like 70% of IPv6 traffic in the US. > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> And yeah, not doing that - actually in the middle of an IPv6 > >> project > >> > >> at > >> > >>>>>> work at the moment that's a bit important to me. > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:45 PM Baldur Norddahl < > >> > >>>> baldur.nordd...@gmail.com > >> > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> Den 4. jun. 2016 01.26 skrev "Cryptographrix" < > >> > >>>> cryptograph...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> The information I'm getting from Netflix support now is > >> explicitly > >> > >>>>>>> telling > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> me to turn off IPv6 - someone might want to stop them before > >> they > >> > >>>>>>>> completely kill US IPv6 adoption. > >> > >>>>>>> Not allowing he.net tunnels is not killing ipv6. You just > need > >> > need > >> > >>>>>>> native > >> > >>>>>>> ipv6. > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> On the other hand it would be nice if Netflix would try the > >> other > >> > >>>>>>> protocol > >> > >>>>>>> before blocking. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >