On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 20:57 -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > > zero interoperability, and no viable migration paths, it's a > > > Forklift > > > Upgrade(tm). > > > > You say that with such confidence! Doesn't make it true. > > https://archive.psg.com/120206.nanog-v4-life-extension.pdf
Zero interoperability is technically true. However the two protocols can live very happily side by side, NOT interfering with each other. Ricky saying "zero interoperability" is technically true - but not really relevant. As to "no viable upgrade paths" you seem to be a good example of NOT that. Did you replace all your equipment in one great and costly spasm to achieve IPv6 delivery to customers? Getting IPv6 up and running is not a simple thing, but nor is it leaking-blood-from-the ears territory. "It's a forklift upgrade! There are no viable upgrade paths! Zero interoperability!" - this is just Chicken Little stuff. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: E00D 64ED 9C6A 8605 21E0 0ED0 EE64 2BEE CBCB C38B Old fingerprint: 3C41 82BE A9E7 99A1 B931 5AE7 7638 0147 2C3C 2AC4
