On 10/28/16 12:18 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: > Level3 hasn't even finished migrating its TWTelecom customers to the L3 AS > yes, and it's been years. So I don't think you can expect any faster > transition for CL. 3549 still exists... > -mel beckman > >> On Oct 28, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Timothy Lister <incu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So if this went through, how would it happen? Does 3356 (L3) absorb 209's >> (CL) infrastructure and slowly make customers change their peering config >> to hit 3356 instead? >> >> You make a good point, I have at least a couple clients that peer to both >> providers for redundancy. One of which just recently signed an agreement >> with CenturyLink for the sole purpose of fail over. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> Re: CenturyLink in Advanced Talks to Merge With Level 3 Communications - >> Interweb is doomed >> From: Jima <na...@jima.us> >> To: <nanog@nanog.org> >>>>> On 10/27/2016 12:36, Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG wrote: >>>>> :-) >> http://www.wsj.com/articles/centurylink-in-advanced-talks-to-merge-with-level-3-communications-1477589011 >> >> >> This is great! Except for all of their mutual customers who had circuits >> from both for redundancy. (See also: Level 3's and TWTC's mutual >> customers, and probably a long list of other M&A I'm not thinking of >> off-hand.) >> >> OK, I lied about it being great anyway. >> >> Jima >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> Re: CenturyLink in Advanced Talks to Merge With Level 3 Communications - >> Interweb is doomed >> From: Jima <na...@jima.us> >> To: <nanog@nanog.org>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
