Scheduling question: I assume this is the slot on the agenda that say: "NANOG 70 Peering Coordination Forum"
I'm not seeing it on the schedule. Has a lot been assigned? John Kemp On 4/17/17 6:03 AM, Bevan Slattery wrote: > Hi! Love the interconnection track. Great stuff. But I can't help but > think limiting interconnection to the peering/IXP view seems to be looking at > interconnection from the rear view mirror. > > I just think that changing the track name from peering/IXP to > "Interconnection" has the optionality to be a bit more looking forward. > Interconnection in the network world is becoming more sophisticated and > important than just old school peering (hearing the gasps of horror from the > Nanog peering cabal at that statement) ;) > > Cheers > > [b] > >> On 17 Apr 2017, at 9:52 pm, Mehmet Akcin <meh...@akcin.net> wrote: >> >> Thank you very much for sending privately and publicly an overwhelming >> number of suggestions. I do appreciate you taking time and writing things >> up in detail. I am doing my best with help of Greg H from PC to put these >> thoughts on paper. >> >> It looks like there is a great interest to make this track focusing on >> tooling and automation as well as introductions of new game changing ixps. >> >> I would like to invite all new IXPs to come and talk about what they offer >> (ie denver-ix) >> >> I also would like to invite any existing IXPs to announce price discounts >> to their services. This is the only update we will have time in this >> interconnection track. Unfortunately no graphs, other updates. >> >> Few questions, Seattle is beautiful in summer and I hope to have many of >> you in person in beautiful washington state, but for those who can't >> travel, should we record / live stream this session? (Historically we did >> keep peering track off the grid... i believe) >> >> Would it be interesting to focus on peering challenges globally or strictly >> focus on north america? >> >> Last but not least, If you have a tool you want to talk about in >> interconnection track that is directly involved with peering setup, etc. >> please do contact me offlist. >> >> Cheers! Looking forward to it. >> >>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 1:36 PM Mehmet Akcin <meh...@akcin.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> As promised few months ago publically I have volunteered to bring together >>> content to have Peering Track back to agenda. Now called "Interconnection >>> Track" >>> >>> I would like to ask those who will attend, have attended in person in the >>> past or those who have organized similar events to chime in and help >>> suggest topics to cover in this 90 min session. >>> >>> I must say, Interconnection Track has been a major part if NANOG for many >>> years. We have watched those who we consider as legends to discuss very >>> important topics there. >>> >>> Please try to make your suggestion in order of importance for you as well >>> as from community. >>> >>> I can try to do my best with help of few folks to bring this track back >>> but you can help make it even better so please take a moment and send me >>> your suggestions. >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Mehmet >>>
