Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 22, 2017, at 07:38, Eric Dugas <edu...@unknowndevice.ca> wrote: > > Hello, > > We're planning to phase out some 10G link-aggregations in favor of 100G > interfaces. We've been looking at buying MIC3-3D-1X100GE-CFP, MPC3E and > Fiberstore CFPs. > > I've been told that CFPs (in general) weren't that reliable. They were > kinda "replaced" almost a year and a half or so after its introduction by > CFP2 and then by CFP4 and so on. Size and power consumption aside, are the > MIC3-3D-1X100GE-CFP and CFP modules reliable at all? Are they the SFP-TX of > the 100GBase? CFP has been around a while, like 8 years at this point. CFP2 and CFP4 are significantly smaller have accordingly lower power budgets and do not include the DSP on board (the linecard for cfp/2/4/8 differs significantly respecting level of integration components and so forth and also port count). Apart from the resulting low port density per card, which makes them unsuitable for a number applications they're mature products at this point. > > Eric >